Our team of federal False Claims Act (FCA) defense attorneys represents corporations, executives, and healthcare providers under investigation—not whistleblowers. We are defense lawyers first and foremost.
With former DOJ prosecutors, government agency lawyers, and trial-experienced attorneys, we understand precisely how federal prosecutors build FCA and whistleblower‑related cases—and more importantly, how to dismantle them. Whether your company is facing a CID, target letter, or indictment, early legal intervention can make a measurable difference in your outcome.
When the federal government (OIG, DOJ, FBI) comes knocking on your door, services you with a Civil Investigative Demand (CID), Subpoena, or gives notice of your indictment for federal False Claims Act fraud, understanding what to do next is critical.
Whether you are a government contractor, Subcontractor or CEO accused of committing some other False Claims to the government, these are serious charges. You also need federal False Claims Act attorneys and whistleblower defense lawyers who not only know the prosecution’s playbook, but you also need defense attorneys who understand the underlying actions that you supposedly have violated federal regulations, SEC rules etc. This is where we come in.
Watson & Associates, LLC’s federal False Claims Act defense lawyers represent defendants in False Claims Act / whistleblower cases. Some of the law firm’s federal lawyers include former prosecutors, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys, government attorneys and defense lawyers.
Our 31 USC 3729–3733 and 18 USC 287 civil and criminal False Claims Act lawyers and whistleblower defense attorneys are standing by to help you with your federal criminal False Claims Act defense.
We represent corporations, CEO’s and high-level individuals across the United States in cases involving government contract fraud, SEC fraud, healthcare fraud, criminal False Claims Act conspiracy changes, Trade Agreements Act (TAA Compliance), Buy American Act (BAA Compliance), Bank fraud charges, SBA PPP fraud and other federal white collar crimes for “false and fraudulent” claims.
Who Are Our Clients?
As federal False Claims Act lawyers, we represent clients that include:
False Claims Act allegations threaten more than finances—they jeopardize your reputation, contracts, and future business eligibility. Over the past two decades, our defense team has counseled clients in every major federal enforcement area, including healthcare reimbursement matters, defense contracting, and research grant disputes. Each case is tailored to your organization’s industry, regulatory exposure, and long‑term business objectives.
The first two days are the most critical. Federal investigators may begin reviewing company records, interviewing employees, or contacting business partners. Actions taken during this time can affect your outcome. A quick, informed response led by experienced FCA counsel can prevent irreversible mistakes.
Many executives talk to investigators without legal guidance, allow incomplete disclosures, or delete data. Even unintentional actions can appear obstructive. The smartest move is to preserve all documents and involve counsel before any contact occurs—showing cooperation without compromising defense strength.
Intent is often unclear at first. Although some False Claims Act cases begin as administrative audits, they can escalate quickly if data appears misleading or incomplete. An attorney can demonstrate that discrepancies were administrative—not deliberate—potentially preventing criminal escalation.
Time Equals Leverage. If you’ve been served with a subpoena, CID, or indictment, every hour matters.
Call (866) 601‑5518 now to speak directly with a senior federal criminal defense attorney— our lines are available 24 hours, 7 days a week where you can set up an appointment to speak to an attorney
Suspension or debarment risk depends on how the response is handled. Early engagement with agency suspension officials can reduce business disruption and demonstrate compliance improvements. Legal teams experienced in federal contracting can advocate for reinstatement while defending the core claims.
Yes. Favorable resolutions often result from presenting strong compliance evidence or procedural flaws in the government’s case. The right strategy may convert a criminal inquiry into a civil one—protecting corporate reputation and executive freedom.
Under federal law, decision-makers tied to billing, certifying, or managing contract performance can be held individually accountable. A defense strategy focused on governance structure and delegation of authority can often limit personal liability exposure.
Deadlines are short—typically 10 to 20 days. Late or incomplete responses can escalate investigations and narrow your options. Immediate counsel intervention ensures a structured response and avoids waived rights.
Experience at the DOJ or with complex federal litigation directly informs negotiation strategy and procedural awareness. Firms with federal‑side experience often anticipate agency tactics, identify weak evidence early, and manage parallel civil and criminal matters—all critical to minimizing damage.
If you’ve been subpoenaed, received a CID, or were named in a federal indictment, time is a decisive factor.
Call (866) 601‑5518 for immediate consultation with a senior federal defense attorney—your first step toward protecting what you’ve built.
1. What should I do if I receive a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) or target letter?
Contact legal counsel before responding. Every statement, document, or email can be used to expand the scope of the case. Our team ensures your responses are timely, accurate, and strategically limited to avoid unintentional admissions.
2. Can DOJ or OIG investigations turn civil inquiries into criminal cases?
Yes. Parallel investigations are common. Immediate involvement of counsel can help keep matters civil and prevent escalation to a criminal indictment.
3. What if my company cooperated fully but was still charged under the False Claims Act?
Cooperation does not equal immunity. We develop evidence‑driven strategies to show lack of intent (“scienter”) and good‑faith compliance—two key factors that often determine whether a case results in settlement or dismissal.
4. How do I protect my federal contracts or medical licenses during the process?
Our attorneys intervene early to mitigate suspension or debarment risks and work with agencies to preserve operational continuity while your defense is ongoing.
5. Are whistleblower cases always public?
Not initially—many begin under seal. Our firm monitors qui tam filings that target clients and acts discreetly to handle the matter before it becomes public or damages reputation.
Speak to National Practice Leader, U.S. Air Force Retired Veteran,Theodore Watson (Over 23 Years of Federal Practice) – Admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Speak Directly to Theodore Watson. Top Federal False Claims Act defense lawyer for small businesses and large corporations nationwide.
Of Counsel to Watson & Associates, LLC: Carolyn L. Oliver brings over 40 years of distinguished legal experience to Watson & Associates’ Federal White Collar Defense and Investigations practice. As a former DOJ Prosecutor and Assistant United States Attorney in the Major Frauds Section of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California, Oliver provides clients with representation from a federal white collar criminal defense attorney who has prosecuted the very types of cases she now defends. Her extensive federal prosecution background, combined with her proven track record in complex criminal defense, positions her as a formidable advocate for corporations, CEOs, and individuals facing high-stakes federal investigations.
Carolyn is a recognized leader in criminal defense and False Claims Act lawyer, known for her fierce courtroom advocacy and unwavering commitment to justice. She has successfully defended countless clients, earning a reputation for results-driven strategies and compassionate client care. As Of Counsel to Watson & Associates’ Federal White Collar Criminal Defense and Investigations practice, Oliver focuses her practice on representing companies and individuals in federal criminal and civil investigations and prosecutions by government enforcement agencies, as well as complex federal litigation related to 18 USC 287 & 31 USC 3729 – 3733. She also advises companies on high-profile, complex, and sensitive internal investigations. Read more…
Chris Mancini, Counsel, brings 45 years of criminal defense experience to Watson & Associates, to support the firm’s federal white collar defense False Claims Act attorney services, including eight years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Former DOJ Prosecutor) in the Southern District of Florida (DOJ), where he served as Deputy Chief of both the Criminal Division and Civil Division.
Chris Mancini specializes in navigating the complexities of the federal court system, providing legal advice, investigating False Claims Act conspiracy cases, and building strong defense strategies to protect the firm’s clients’ rights and achieve the best possible outcome as a federal False Claims Act lawyer.
Mancini assists the Watson team with federal civil and criminal matters throughout the United States. His background as a former DOJ attorney and prosecutor aligns with the firm’s emphasis on attorneys with federal agency experience. Mancini’s understanding of federal law enforcement agencies and white collar defense enhances the firm’s capabilities in representing clients facing federal investigations and criminal prosecutions. Mr. Mancini maintains an unblemished 45-year track record of successfully advising and representing corporate and individual clients. His combination of federal prosecution experience and defense practice provides clients with representation from an attorney who understands both sides of federal criminal cases.
If you have been indicted for a federal white collar crime, you should hire experienced white collar crime lawyers to protect your rights and fight back. Read more.
Jon M. Brandon, Of Counsel, is a gifted, award-winning criminal trial lawyer and federal criminal defense lawyer who has spent his career in a courtroom trying complex, high-profile cases. Mr. Brandon was a top prosecutor at one of the largest district attorney offices in the nation, where he also worked as a cross-sworn federal prosecutor (Special Assistant US Attorney) on a large RICO matter.
During his 15-year tenure as a prosecutor in California, Mr. Brandon tried dozens of high-profile trials. He has tried more than 80 trials to verdict. He established himself as an extraordinary white collar trial attorney by winning some of the most serious and complex murder cases statewide.
After serving many years as a homicide prosecutor and government agency leader, Mr. Brandon has turned his attention over the last several years to being a white-collar federal criminal defense lawyer and civil litigation attorney in Texas and the southern region, expanding his repertoire and continuing to employ his litigation skills. Mr. Brandon’s passion for representing individuals, businesses, and organizations thrust into investigations or litigation is apparent in his meticulous case preparation, client-centered approach, insider knowledge, and trial skills. He works tirelessly to ensure every client receives top-notch advocacy and a formidable defense. Read More.
James M. Allen, Of Counsel to Watson & Associates, LLC, is a committed federal white collar criminal defense attorney with experience handling a range of complex matters at the trial and post-conviction levels.
His background includes defending clients in both state and federal forums, with a growing emphasis on federal white collar criminal defense.
As a white collar crime attorney and federal False Claims Act lawyer, he maintains a strong professional interest in matters involving procurement fraud, SBA investigations, and regulatory enforcement and is well-versed in the legal frameworks and defense strategies that shape those cases. As a False Claims Act conspiracy lawyer, James brings a measured, thoughtful approach to every case, prioritizing clarity, strategic planning, and strong client communication.
Wise D. Allen, Esquire , Counsel, is a former Veteran Lieutenant Commander Judge Advocate for the United States Military. He also has extensive knowledge and experience in resolving corporate defense and litigation in vast international and national legal issues.
He brings a wealth of successful experience to government contractors seeking defense counsel in the various areas of procurement fraud, international contracting, False Claims Act defense, and more.
Mr. Allen’s federal litigation experience as a former appellate attorney representing the United States and federal attorney for defendants in trials that led to his clients receiving overwhelmingly favorable outcomes in contested issues and obtaining non-contested resolutions. Read more..
For a FREE Initial Consultation, call 1.866.601.6618 and speak to Mr. Watson. When you’re under federal investigation, time is not on your side.
24 /7 Response . Call (866) 601-5518 now for immediate consultation with a federal health care fraud lawyer. When you’re under federal investigation, time is not on your side.
Our Gov contractor federal appeals lawyer helps with government contract appeals, small business government contracting cases, bid protest appeals, Contract Disputes Act appeals and more.
As federal contractors, you may often find that you received an unfavorable ruling from either the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, ASBCA, CBCA or some other lower trial court. Unfortunately, lower courts do commit a legal error that sometimes can be reversible if you can catch the error in time to meet the appeal deadlines.
By bringing your case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), you can show why your case was wrongly decided and possibly get the decision reversed with the help of our federal appeal attorneys.
Our circuit court appeals law firm helps small businesses and large government contractors litigate complex matters before the appeals court.
Whether you are appealing a bid protest decision from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, a Contract Disputes Act case from ASBCA or Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, or a small business government contract adverse decision, our federal appeal lawyers can help.
Our experienced government contract litigation and trial attorneys and federal appeals lawyers represent our procurement and government contract clients in complex litigation matters including:
How Do We Move Forward in Representing You at the Federal Court of Appeals?
After you decide to file an appeal at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, our government contract federal appeals lawyers start by developing the critical issues for appeal, we also then conduct the legal research to apply prior rulings to the facts in your specific case. In federal government contracting, there is also a myriad of regulations that are highly relevant and must also be reviewed.
Not All Cases Will Survive an Appeal
Our federal appealattorneys cannot guarantee that every case litigated at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will win on appeal. However, a thorough review of the government contracting and procurement law issues and assessment of the lower court’s errors could build the foundation for assessing the likelihood of success.
As federal court lawyers and contractor appeal attorneys, we can represent clients from any state or overseas.
At Watson & Associates, the goal of our federal appeals lawyers is to develop a sound and persuasive appellate brief for submission to the court. Unfortunately, this takes a considerable amount of time and effort.
Drafting an appellate brief to the Circuit Court of Appeals is the bedrock of your case because the judges will review and discuss the briefs internally. Judges will have already assessed your brief before oral arguments. The appellate brief will also set the tone for the credibility of your appellate lawyer and also create questions from the circuit court judges.
As federal appeal lawyers to the federal circuit courts, we understand the substantive areas and United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rules involved in federal procurement including bid protests, Contract Disputes Act, the Court’s jurisdiction, and disputes regarding claims and small business matters.
As your government contract civil appeal attorney, our goal is to keep costs down while developing a strategic plan of action that can convince the federal circuit court judges to rule in your favor. Contact one of our federal circuit appellate lawyers today.
WE ARE LAWYERS FOR APPEALS WHERE OUR CLIENTS ARE EXPERIENCING STRESSFUL SITUATIONS. WE HELP OUR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR CLIENTS TO EVALUATE THE RISKS WHEN TRIAL COURTS ISSUE UNFAVORABLE DECISIONS
As one of the Top Federal Appeals Attorneys for Government Contractors, Three important things to consider when deciding to file an appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
As a federal government contractor, you never want to appeal a lower court’s decision simply because you disagree with it. It simply is not a good reason to file an appeal at the US Court of Appeals Federal Circuit in Washington, DC. Yes, it is part of the thought process. Just do not make it the sole reason simply because you may be angry.
How to find an appeal lawyer? Finding a CAFC Court appeal lawyer that focuses on government contracting cases can be a very difficult task. Federal procurement law is a very unique area of appellate law. Therefore, federal contractors considering how to find an appeal lawyer who understands the issues presented tend to narrow it down to law firms that primarily deal with government contracting cases.
As government contracts civil appeal attorneys of critical lower, we reduce the complexity and headache of finding government contracts appellate lawyers. Our goal is to provide an appellate experience that displays competence, focused experience in legal research, knowledge of government contracts, and experience in appellate legal writing.
Find Out More About Appeals to the Supreme Court of the United States
Get the best federal contractor appellate attorney to assess your case: When appealing a government contracts case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the appellant must have valid grounds for appeal.
Having the best federal appeals attorneys on board who can spot the federal procurement issues and prepare your case for appeal can be a huge benefit to the company. Here are some common grounds for appeal in government contracts cases:
1. Errors of law: If the appellant believes that the lower court made errors in interpreting or applying the law relevant to the case, they can appeal on the grounds of legal errors.
2. Errors of fact: If the appellant believes that the lower court made errors in determining the facts of the case, they can appeal on the grounds of factual errors. However, it’s important to note that appellate courts generally defer to the lower court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.
3. Abuse of discretion: If the appellant believes that the lower court judge abused their discretion in making certain rulings or decisions, they can appeal on the grounds of an abuse of discretion. This typically involves situations where the lower court judge made a decision that was arbitrary, capricious, or clearly unreasonable.
4. Evidentiary or Procedural errors: If the appellant believes that there were significant procedural errors during the trial or pre-trial proceedings that affected the outcome of the case, they can appeal on the grounds of procedural errors. This could include issues such as improper admission or exclusion of evidence, improper jury instructions, or errors in the application of procedural rules.
5. Constitutional issues: If the appellant believes that their constitutional rights were violated during the course of the trial or in the lower court’s decision, they can appeal on the grounds of constitutional issues. This may involve claims related to due process, equal protection, or other constitutional protections.
6. Arbitrary and capricious agency action: In cases involving government contracts, if the appellant believes that the agency’s decision or action was arbitrary and capricious or not supported by substantial evidence, they can appeal on those grounds. This typically arises in cases where the appellant is challenging the decision-making process of a federal agency involved in the contract.
It’s important to note that the specific grounds for appeal can vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, there may be specific procedural requirements and deadlines that must be followed when appealing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Therefore, consulting with an experienced attorney for federal cases that is familiar with government contracts and appellate practice is advisable to navigate the appeal process effectively.
Your case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is not a retrial. It is also not a place to correct mistakes and submit new evidence. Instead, you must show that the lower court committed either a legal or procedural error (that is reversible).
Federal appellate courts have a range of remedies available to them when reviewing cases on appeal. These remedies aim to address errors or issues identified during the lower court proceedings. Here are some common remedies that federal courts can employ:
1. Reversal: The Court of Appeals United States judge may reverse the decision of the lower court, effectively nullifying it. This remedy is appropriate when the appellate court determines that the lower court committed a reversible error that affected the outcome of the case. A reversal may result in a new trial, further proceedings, or a different resolution of the case.
2. Remand: Instead of outright reversing the lower court’s decision, the appellate court may remand the case. Remand means sending the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. The appeals court may remand when it determines that the lower court made errors that require additional fact-finding, reconsideration, or application of the law.
3. Affirmation: If an appellate court affirms a case it means that the lower court’s decision was correct and there were no reversible errors, it may affirm the lower court’s decision. An affirmed appeal means that the lower court’s decision stands and remains in effect.
4. Modification: In some cases, the appellate court may modify the lower court’s decision. This remedy is employed when the court determines that the lower court’s decision was partially correct, but some aspects need adjustment or clarification.
5. Vacate: The appellate court may vacate the lower court’s decision, which means setting it aside. Vacatur is often used when circumstances have changed or the issue has become moot, rendering the lower court’s decision no longer necessary or relevant.
6. Injunctions and Stay Orders
The US Court of Appeals Federal Circuit procedure in a government contracting appeals case has the authority to issue injunctions or stay orders, which temporarily halt or modify the lower court’s decision pending the appeal. These remedies are typically used when there is a risk of irreparable harm or when preserving the status quo is deemed necessary during the appellate process.
It’s important to note that the specific remedies available may vary depending on the nature of the case, the applicable laws and regulations, and the court’s jurisdiction. The court’s decision on the appropriate remedy will depend on the circumstances of the case and the relief sought by the parties involved.
It’s advisable to consult with a qualified attorney who specializes in federal circuit appellate practice to understand the specific remedies applicable to your case and the procedures involved in seeking those remedies.
Federal appeals lawyers at the Watson law firm can help you to assess your case and decide whether there are legal grounds for filing an appeal at the Circuit Court of Appeals.
How is a favorable decision going to help your business?
This is also an important consideration. For example, in a bid protest appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, would a reversal give you a second bite at the procurement?
If you are the initial awardee, would a favorable Court of Appeals decision give you back the contract? How does appellate litigation impact future government contract relationships? These are all very important considerations.
What are the costs of your appeal case?
Similar to a case being appealed to the United States Supreme Court, Government contractor appeals to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit can be very expensive. In high-stakes procurements, businesses may see value in the appeal. Others may not. Appellate attorneys spend a lot of time doing legal research, assessing the record at the lower court, and writing appellate briefs.
If you are a government contractor seeking to appeal a decision from the Court of Federal Claims, an adverse criminal or civil judgment involving a federal government contract, sit with one of our Court of Appeals United States appellate lawyers and have an informed decision as to the reality of appealing your case.
Call the US Court of Appeals Federal Circuit Appeals Lawyers for Government Contractors at Watson Today: If you are a federal government contractor and have recently received an adverse decision from the Court of Federal Claims (COFC); ASBCA or CBCA, call government contractor appellate attorney at Watson & Associates, LLC to look at possibly filing an appeal to the Courts of Appeals United States for the Federal Circuit.
Theodore P. Watson
Bid Protest Attorney & Consultant
View Profile
Cheryl Adams
Attorney and Consultant
View Profile
We aim to lead in each practice and area of law we work in. Coming from in-depth understanding of the law and the industry, capitalizing on extensive experience, we provide hands-on advice that speaks the language of our client’s business. Whether in aviation, sales and distribution, antitrust, corporate and M&A, finance etc.
Sometimes you may find yourself in difficult situations and not be able to defuse the situation without going to court.
San Diego, California, 92101.
WANT TO STAY UPDATED?
SIGN UP TODAY …
It’s Free!
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes; this is attorney advertising only. All information on this website has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While this information may constitute attorney advertising in some jurisdictions, reading this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your MUST engage with an attorney to create a legal relationship. Every case is different, any prior result described or referred to herein cannot guarantee similar outcomes in the future in any type of case. All visitors to this Website are informed that Watson & Associates, LLC works with affiliated lawyers (referred to as “Local Counsel”) in various cities and states across the United States. These Local Counsel may assist the Firm on a case-by-case basis, operate their own respective law firms, are independent of Firm, and are not partners, owners, of counsel, or employees of Firm. Clients and prospective clients should be aware that when referencing to Firm’s experience, this experience may combine the knowledge and experience of both Firm and its frequently used Local Counsel in the aggregate.
Specifically, if and when Firm cooperates with Local Counsel, Firm will disclose the details to the client in writing for their approval. In some cases, pursuant to Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the equivalent in other jurisdictions, a case is referred to a Local Counsel, the Firm will not participate in the representation. In such a case, a client will sign an engagement exclusively with the Local Counsel. Watson &. Associates, LLC is headquartered in Denver, Colorado and it only maintains a fully equipped office in Denver and Washington DC. References to a particular city or state other than Denver, Colorado and Washington DC, in any article or anywhere on this website does NOT mean that Firm maintains an office in that location, and it does NOT mean that Firm has attorneys physically located in that city or state. Firm’s lawyers are only licensed to practice state law in the states mentioned in their respective biographies. With few case-by-case exceptions, Firm’s practice is limited to matters and questions of federal law and federal procedure. Firm’s engagement letter and Firm’s website disclaimers provide additional details.
Our government contracts attorney services cover all states regarding legal and non-legal matters. We assist federal small businesses and large DoD contractors in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington, DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Cities in which our government contracts attorneys assist federal government contractors include:
Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Colorado Springs, CO; Dallas, TX; Denver, Colorado; Indianapolis, IN; Las Vegas, NV; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; San Jose, CA; Santa Clara, CA; and Tampa, FL.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes; this is attorney advertising only. All information on this website has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While this information may constitute attorney advertising in some jurisdictions, reading this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your MUST engage with an attorney to create a legal relationship. Every case is different, any prior result described or referred to herein cannot guarantee similar outcomes in the future in any type of case. All visitors to this Website are informed that Watson & Associates, LLC works with affiliated lawyers (referred to as “Local Counsel”) in various cities and states across the United States. These Local Counsel may assist the Firm on a case-by-case basis, operate their own respective law firms, are independent of Firm, and are not partners, owners, of counsel, or employees of Firm. Clients and prospective clients should be aware that when referencing to Firm’s experience, this experience may combine the knowledge and experience of both Firm and its frequently used Local Counsel in the aggregate. Specifically, if and when Firm cooperates with Local Counsel, Firm will disclose the details to the client in writing for their approval. In some cases, pursuant to Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the equivalent in other jurisdictions, a case is referred to a Local Counsel, the Firm will not participate in the representation. In such a case, a client will sign an engagement exclusively with the Local Counsel. Watson &. Associates, LLC is headquartered in Denver, Colorado and it only maintains a fully equipped office in Denver and Washington DC. References to a particular city or state other than Denver, Colorado and Washington DC, in any article or anywhere on this website does NOT mean that Firm maintains an office in that location, and it does NOT mean that Firm has attorneys physically located in that city or state. Firm’s lawyers are only licensed to practice state law in the states mentioned in their respective biographies. With few case-by-case exceptions, Firm’s practice is limited to matters and questions of federal law and federal procedure. Firm’s engagement letter and Firm’s website disclaimers provide additional details.
Our government contracts attorney services cover all states regarding legal and non-legal matters. We assist federal small businesses and large DoD contractors in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington, DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Cities in which our government contracts attorneys assist federal government contractors include Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Colorado Springs, CO; Dallas, TX; Denver, Colorado; Indianapolis, IN; Las Vegas, NV; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; San Jose, CA; Santa Clara, CA; and Tampa, FL.
© 2026 by Watson & Associates. All Rights Reserved
